Skyscrapers And The Curse Of Recessions

One useful indicator of when countries will slip into recession or economic downturn is the completion dates of major skyscrapers. I’ve checked lists of major tall buildings, and almost all countries were entering a bleak period economically when prominent towers were completed or nearing completion. (The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat provides a useful list.)

The list is too neat to be a coincidence. Here’s a list from selected countries:

• The Empire State Building: Completed 1931, as the US was entering the Great Depression.

• New York’s World Trade Centre and Chicago’s Sears Tower: Completed in 1973 and 1974 respectively, when the US suffered from the oil shock.

• London’s Canary Wharf Tower: Completed in 1991, when the UK was in severe recession. Ditto Frankfurt’s Messeturm, which was at the time the tallest building in Europe.

• Yokohama’s Landmark Tower: Japan’s tallest building was completed in 1993, just as the country was entering what turned out to be its ‘lost decade’.

• Bangkok’s Baiyoke II Tower: This was completed in 1997, the same year that the baht currency went into meltdown, taking the Thai economy with it.

• Malaysia’s Petronas Towers: These were conceived as a symbol of Malaysia’s emerging wealth and power. Unfortunately, they were completed in 1998, the second year of Asia’s financial collapse.

• Even North Korea is not immune from this curse. The outer structure of Pyongyang’s 105-storey Ryugyong Hotel was completed in 1992, a year after North Korea’s trading relations with historic allies Russia and China were cut back, causing it severe economic difficulty.

This pattern is no surprise. Skyscrapers are conceived in boom times, and by the time designs have been finalized, planning permission approved, and the last cranes removed, economies are typically in a downturn. Some, of course, never get past the drawing board, as was the case with Obayashi Corp’s 500-storey 2,000m high Aeropolis – but they do capture the economic zeitgeist.

With this in mind, it’s worth looking at current projects’ completion dates for future economic malaise. Several are potentially worrisome:

• The Burj Dubai, which will be the world’s tallest skyscraper (800+ metres, with 160 floors), is due to be completed in mid-2009. Will it mark the end of the Middle East’s boom?

• Although the Shanghai World Financial Centre (China’s tallest building) was finished in 2008, an even taller building, the Shanghai Centre, is due for completion in 2014. Will it coincide with China’s first recession? Or should we still be worried about the former building?

• The APIIC Tower (100 storeys) in Hyderabad is due to be ready in 2010. Does this spell doom for India?

• Moscow’s 118-storey Russia Tower is due in 2012. By that time we should have a clearer picture of the country’s long-term economic direction.

I see that Brazil has no major skyscrapers under construction. Perhaps this will spare it a major downturn. Alas, though, Panama has a handful of major skyscrapers planned over the next few years.

However, just to end on a positive note, all those empty skyscrapers should provide plenty of cheap office space for when economies pick up.

5 Responses to “Skyscrapers And The Curse Of Recessions”

  1. norlinie Says:

    petronas twin towers are well inihibited by now. in fact, they are running out of space to make room for tenants. ;)

  2. Anon Says:

    Interesting post. I agree that it is no coincidence and that the time and planning required for skyscraper construction makes their completion dates usually behind the growth curve. The Empire State Building was long referred to as the ‘Empty State Building’ due to the lack of demand for office space during the depression. Similarly, the World Trade Center was much decried as a waste of public money (It was owned and built by the Port Authority) and was only filled (partially) because of government agencies moving there. Note that the Russia Tower in Moscow has halted construction due to lack of financing.

    The problem with skyscrapers (and new tier 1 office space in general) is that to justify financing for a new building, rents usually have to rise first to a certain level, which will naturally only occur toward the tail-end of the growth-portion of the economic cycle. By definition then, their completion will only occur after the peak.

    I have seen this process precisely in my own home town in Canada(a city of 1 million), where after a 25-year dearth of new commercial skyscrapers, only now is ground being broken for two new towers: right when the country is entering recession!

  3. Bill Says:

    Remember the Tower of Babel!

  4. Calgaryoilman Says:

    In Calgary, Encana (a major natural gas company) is in the middle of producing a landmark new skyscraper headquarters that will be the tallest building in Canada outside Toronto when completed. ‘Seems a bit hubristic now that energy prices have fallen out.

  1. Trackback: riskwatchdog.com/2008/12/03/panama-property-in-a-real-estate

Leave a Reply


© 2012 Business Monitor International Ltd About Us | Contact Us